My bounty is as boundless as
the sea,
My love as deep; the more I
give to thee,
The more I have, for both are
infinite.
Romeo and Juliet, Act two,
Scene two
Randolph Stow was prominent in Australian literature and
letters in the late 1950s and sixties and seventies. He is well known for his
evocation of Australian landscapes, notions of home and homecoming, cross-cultural
paradox and the complex challenges of living life on the margin. His most well-known
novels are perhaps Tourmaline, The Merry-Go-Round-in the Sea, and
my personal favourite, To the Islands.
In the 2019 Randolph Stow Memorial Lecture (link
here) published in the excellent occidental literary journal Westerly
(vol 64.1), Andrew Lynch considers four inter-connected themes that permeate Stow’s
writings: trauma, myth, love and home. I don’t propose to summarise nor
critically assess Lynch’s astute and incisive observations but rather wish to
lean on him to showcase the enduring and contemporary relevance of Stow’s writing
as we try to come to terms with the complexity, irrationality, and seemingly ubiquitous
horror of the world around us, be it local, national or international.
Accordingly, I will quote at some length from a section of Lynch’s
lecture under the heading Trauma:
The protagonist of the story,
an ageing Anglican missionary, Stephen Heriot, has lost his sense of purpose in
life, and believing he has killed an Indigenous man, wanders into ‘Dead Man’s
Land’, thinking about ‘being born out of crimes’: ‘ “It was because of murders
that I was ever born in this country. It was because of murders that my first
amoebic ancestor ever survived to be my ancestor. Every day in my life murders
are done to protect me. People are taught how to murder because of me” ’ (To
the Islands 159–60). Heriot feels personally implicated in an endless cycle of
violence. Part of this feeling comes from self-obsession and melancholic
introversion, but part of it comes from his increasing inability to disconnect
the work of his mission from the broader mission of colonial exploitation. In
his pastoral life, he looks for a fusion of Indigenous and European cultural
expression. But, as a white man, he comes to see himself as an aggressor to the
local people, and his attempts to identify with them create a sense of survivor
guilt. Typically of Stow’s protagonists, Heriot’s ending is to find himself
alone. Yet in his aloneness he takes the next step on an inner journey, as at
the land’s edge he looks out over the sea for the islands of the dead:
The old man knelt among the
bones and stared into the light. His carved lips were firm in the white beard,
his hands were steady, his ancient blue eyes, neither hoping nor fearing,
searched sun and sea for the least dark hint of a landfall. ‘My soul,’ he
whispered over the sea surge, ‘my soul is a strange country.’ (208)
In a final section of the lecture under the heading Love
and Home, Lynch observes, inter alia, that for Stow:
Love brings grief, but it is
the creative energy that survives trauma and death, and allows continuity.
And later summarising the concluding revelation of the
protagonist of a later novel, The Girl Green as Elderflower, Lynch notes:
It’s not ancestry — ‘where are
you from?’ — but where you love that makes ‘home’.
If this makes sense, if we agree with the sentiment, then
it raises important issues for we Australians, as the corollary is that if we
want Australia to be and to remain our ‘home’ in that deeper sense, we must
find ways to ensure that love (or if you prefer, values such as deep respect,
generosity, acceptance, and forgiveness) are present in and hopefully permeate
our civic society and our lives: our personal lives, our professional lives, our
institutional lives and even our political lives.
The alternative is to live out our days in a strange
country, infected by xenophobia, inhabited by strangers, estranged from each
other, and importantly, estranged from our own selves.
15 December 2025
Well said Mike! We do live in a strange country....!
ReplyDelete