I
praise God for you sir: your reasons …have been sharp and sententious, pleasant
without scurrility, witty without affection, audacious without impudency, learned
without opinion, and strange without heresy.
Love’s
Labour Lost, Act 5, Scene 1.
The Australian Public Service
Commission last week released the Commonwealth Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander Workforce Strategy 2020-2024 (link here).
The core objectives of the Strategy are laid out in the text below (graphics
removed):
Overall
Commonwealth workforce representation targets
The
Commonwealth aspires to achieve a stretch target of 3 per cent Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander employee representation for the Senior Executive Service
by 2024, the final year of the Strategy.
To
achieve the desired outcome, the Commonwealth should aim to invest in
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander representation at the APS 4 to APS 6
levels (or equivalent) to 5 per cent by the end of 2022, this will help build
the pipeline; and representation of 5 per cent at the Executive Levels 1 and 2
by the end of 2024.
Initially
this will be achieved through targeted recruitment with a longer term focus on
developing employees within the public sector to enable promotion into the more
senior roles.
Commonwealth
stretch targets
To
support the Commonwealth in building the talent pipeline, each portfolio should
aim to achieve a stretch target of 3 per cent Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander representation at each classification level in their workforce
by 2024, the final year of the Strategy.
The Mandarin reported on the
release of the Strategy (link here)
and quoted the Public Service Commissioner, Peter Woolcott as saying the plan would
set the direction for all employers across the Commonwealth, and would ‘accelerate
improvements in closing the gap in social and economic outcomes between
Indigenous Australians and non-Indigenous Australians’ by building on the
achievements of the previous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander employment strategy. Unfortunately,
the new strategy provides no contextual data to assist in identifying and
fleshing out the ‘achievements’ of the previous strategy.
About 15 months ago, I commented
on the desultory progress in reflecting the demographic composition of First
Nations within the APS, particularly at SES levels. My post, titled Indigenous
Employment in the APS: a policy recommendation can be found here.
I argued there that what was required was a Prime Ministerial commitment to
doubling the Indigenous representation in the SES within four years. Such a commitment
would send the required message to Departmental Secretaries who are the key
decisionmakers on SES appointments.
The present strategy adopts a
rather different approach, although it appears similar to the untrained eye. It
has the backing of the Public Service Commissioner and the Minister for Indigenous
Australians, but relies on something termed ‘stretch targets’. A target is not
a commitment, and a stretch target is a target that we acknowledge up front
will be extremely difficult to attain.
Of course, targets without
resources and /or incentives are unlikely to be met. I see little in the way of
extra resources for the APS to prioritise these targets over the multiple other
challenges they face, nor do I see persuasive incentives in place pushing agencies
to take the decisive action that will be required to meet these targets.
Further, while the notion of a pipeline from EL1 and EL2 levels into the SES
makes intuitive sense, the reality is that there is not enough time in a four
year strategy for this to have anything more than a marginal impact on SES
levels of representation.
My conclusion is that this new
strategy is more about rhetoric more than reality. For comparison, look to New
Zealand where agency heads have been given legislative requirements to support
Maori leadership within the public service (see my earlier post on New Zealand
public sector reform here).
It is also worth reminding
ourselves that less than a year ago, the Government published the Thodey Review
and its response. It landed with a resounding silence. My assessment of the
implications of the Thodey Review for Indigenous Australians can be found here…it
is salient that Thodey said very little specific regarding Indigenous representation
within the SES, and the Government walked away from anything which appeared to challenge
the status quo. As a result there is no cross reference in the recently
released workforce strategy. More significantly, the underlying message to
agencies and their leadership was that Indigenous issues are not the priority.
In that sense, the current Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Workforce Strategy
can be seen as entirely aligned with the status quo: all talk but little action.
No comments:
Post a Comment