Defer no time, delays have
dangerous ends.
1
Henry VI, Act 3, scene 2.
Here are two important policy perspectives on the current
pandemic and its implications for First Nations.
First, a reader of this Blog with significant and ongoing engagement
in remote Australia sent me the following comments / policy suggestions which
resonated strongly with me. I set them out in full below.
Second, I also set out the Abstract to a new Topical Issues
paper from the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research at the ANU (where
I am a Visiting Fellow), which sets out eight short policy perspectives from
researchers associated with the Centre. I am one of those contributors.
###########################################
Policy pathways for a COVID 19 response in
remote Aboriginal communities
In recent weeks remote and regional Australia has witnessed
the three spheres of Australian governments - local, state and Commonwealth -
collaborate in an unusually quick and effective way to achieve the mass
movement of large numbers of Aboriginal people out of regional towns and back
into the many hundreds of Aboriginal Australia that are dotted across the
regional landscape. This has been achieved by enlisting the support of
Aboriginal leaders and Aboriginal organisations, backed up at times with wider community
and industry support.
Almost every remote community across regional and remote
Australia has rapidly increased in population size without evidence of the additional
resources heading their way necessary to respond to these new circumstances.
Unless there is urgent response, proportionate to the magnitude
of the new circumstances in which these remote communities have been thrust,
the Aboriginal leadership and organisations who assisted government in
delivering on this rushed population movement could understandably make
themselves unavailable to subsequent government approaches when local support
might be even more desperately sought.
The Federal Government’s previous policy position -
implemented resolutely over the last decade - has been to walk away from
earlier partnerships with the States, no longer supporting the essential
municipal services and housing construction programs needed in these remote
Aboriginal communities. That Federal policy position firmed up and has been
pursued despite evidence of serious negative impact across Australia.
This implied new policy position of the Federal government
- as evidenced by their active support for the mass movement of Aboriginal
people - has been hurriedly expressed in terms that it is “for their own good”
that in the face of this pandemic, Aboriginal people should move back onto
country and reduce the Covid-19 risk to themselves that they are otherwise
facing. An unstated objective would appear to be de-risking the regional towns
of remote Australia and therefore protecting the wider population.
However, a whole host of other new risks and consequences
open up as a result of the assisted sudden demographic shift. Not least of all
is the risk of an outbreak of the standard lethal diseases that can too easily
take hold of overcrowded populations living in unhygienic conditions.
With COVID 19 at risk of exploding across Aboriginal
Australia, acute unprecedented crisis is recognised. To respond to this crisis
and save as many lives as possible, rather than simply following mainstream
templates, governments will need to urgently adopt innovative pathways tailored
to the specific contexts of Aboriginal Australia.
Most pressing is urgent funding to deliver increased
shelter, housing and ablution facilities for the remote communities of regional
Aboriginal Australia; not only to ensure that Aboriginal people can avoid
Covid-19 but also avoid an explosion in the standard lethal diseases; for
example, dysentery.
There is a clear and real role here to support the
leadership and authority of the Native Title Prescribed Body Corporates; and, in
regions like the Pilbara and Kimberley, to bolster the significant Aboriginal
owned and run organisations and building companies which - IF SPECIFICALLY
FUNDED FOR THE TASK - could immediately step up and use their capacity and
experience to deliver shelter, housing and much needed improvements in ablution
facilities and protected water supplies.
During the period of this pandemic and beyond, support for
on-country economic and employment opportunities for Aboriginal people will
need to be embedded into the landscape of regional Aboriginal Australia. These
include seed-collection programs for emerging mine revegetation and
rehabilitation programs; expanded ranger programs; on-country artist
development and support programs; and currently unavailable online technologies
that allow Aboriginal Australians who wish to access the mainstream education,
training, and employment opportunities that Australia has to offer.
Taken together, these modest policy innovations would allow
remote Aboriginal Australians to stay on their communities close to country;
assist in facilitating the effective maintenance of social distance and social
isolation and thus minimise the risk of disease; provide increased access to
employment opportunities on communities; and provide access to remotely delivered
education, health and employment opportunities.
##################################################
Abstract
This Topical Issue is a compilation of eight short papers
that have been written during the rapid escalation of the Australian response
to the COVID-19 pandemic.
First Nations people are being, and will continue to be,
affected by this crisis in ways that differ from the effects on other
Australians. The pandemic risks exacerbating deep-seated health, social and
economic inequities in Australian society, especially the long-standing
inequalities between First Nations people and other Australians. The pandemic
has also made plain the shortcomings of the relationships between Indigenous
people and Australian governments, revealing a governance gap that is difficult
to ignore. But despite these inimical conditions, the disruption of the
COVID-19 crisis is opening up new opportunities for public policy change. And
many First Nation organisations and communities are leading the way. Unprecedented
new government expenditure creates space for policy innovation, as the
boundaries of what is possible become blurred. The pandemic is a
time of stark risks, but it is also a time when informed policy bravery could
create new foundations for a better future.
Contributions to this Topical Issue focus on employment
impacts, social security reforms, Indigenous governance, violence against
women, the Indigenous health workforce, school closures, energy security in
remote communities, and a proposal for an Indigenous reconstruction agency
The link to the CAEPR Topical Issues Paper is here.
I concur with all the modest policy proposals made by the anonymous contributor. But can I also add a few observations and suggestions. First, there is a lot of under-utilised housing at homelands that could rapidly relieve township overcrowding. Second the regional organisations that could be mobilised could include those Outstation Resource Agencies that are still standing after significant defunding in the wake of ATSIC's demise (in 2000 there were over 100 ORAs in remote Australia) and the conversion of some to Community Development Program (that is job search) providers. Given the suspension of CDP by Minister Wyatt maybe these organisations could be rapidly redeployed to do some real community development in the struggle (I'll avoid military metaphors) against the spread of COVID-19. Finally, let's not overlook the important role that self provisioning via food sovereignty might afford people returning to live on their country. Lest we forget native title rights and interests include the right to harvest natural resources, a legal right confirmed by the High Court of Australia in 1999 in Yanner versus Eaton. The neoliberal state has looked to eliminate such food sovereignty rights through policies of centralisation, imposed make work and tying people to stores with BasicsCard and the Cashless Debit Card (although we all seem to be heading in a cashless direction most Australians do not have restrictions placed on either the nature or place of their expenditures). As the market economy is being closed down by the state in the interests of public health, perhaps the non-market customary economy can be revived in the interests of Indigenous health. Finally, many important Aboriginal enterprises including art centres and ranger programs are experiencing loss of revenue, hopefully they will benefit from programs such as JobKeeper that in looking to subsidise mainstream business to ensure their survival should not overlook not quite mainstream but nonetheless worthy Indigenous businesses that will also need support to survive.
ReplyDelete