Fortune, that arrant whore,
Ne’er turns the key to the
poor
King Lear, Act 2, scene 2.
Hannah McGlade, an academic and member of the UN Permanent Forum
on Indigenous Issues (link
here)
has recently argued (link
here)
that the risks of COVID 19 in prisons requires the early release of at risk
Indigenous prisoners:
With the over-representation
of our people in prison, our lives are on the line.
We are calling for immediate
early release, particularly of people who are on remand, women who are victims
of family violence and sentenced for lesser offences like fines and public
order offences, young people and those most at risk of transmitting Covid-19,
like elderly and people with health conditions.
McGlade cites similar calls from the Chair of the National
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Services (NATSILS), Cheryl Axelby:
see NATSILS media release on the COVID-19 crisis (link
here).
These statements, by focussing attention on Indigenous incarceration, bring
into view the deeper and more longstanding issue of Indigenous
over-representation in our prisons. McGlade raises the issue in her article,
but she is far from alone.
The issue of Indigenous incarceration is of course
politically sensitive and complex. It is prone to political manipulation, and
self-righteous appeals to law and order, and the propensity of voters to want
simplistic solutions to complex problems. There are crimes that require
imprisonment, and there is a case for a prison system aimed at deterrence and
rehabilitation. The issue with Indigenous incarceration in Australia, however,
is that it appears to operate in a structurally discriminatory manner, contrary
to the near ubiquitous notion that justice is dispensed without fear or favour.
On Sunday, the Canberra Times ran a full page article (link
here)
headlined ‘A national disgrace, nobody cares’. The sub-headline in the print
edition was ‘Indigenous incarceration is on the rise and government are failing
to act on recommendations’. The author, Philip Lee was for five years from 2005
to 2010 Chairperson of the Sentence Administration Board of the ACT (link
here).
The gist of Lee’s article are two-fold: first, that the statistics on Indigenous
incarceration are disproportionate to the representation of Indigenous people
in the community; and second, that the recommendations of the 2017 Australian
Law Reform Commission Report Pathways to Justice – Incarceration rates of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (ATSI) Peoples (link
here)
by Federal Circuit Court Judge Matthew Myers, commissioned by the Federal
Government three years ago, and delivered to the Government over two years ago,
have not been implemented.
Lee cites extensive statistics from the ALRC and other
sources; here is just one key paragraph:
The ALRC Report noted that
ATSI men are 14.7 times more likely to be imprisoned than non-indigenous men
and that ATSI women are 21.2 times more likely to be imprisoned than
non-indigenous women. The report also noted that although ATSI adults make up
around 2 per cent of the national population they constitute 27 per cent of the
national prison population.
Lee concludes his article with the following assessment:
The Commonwealth government
stands condemned for failing to implement the recommendations of an ALRC report
on the rate of Indigenous incarceration which it commissioned almost three
years ago.
The tabling of the ALRC report in March 2018 somehow evaded
my attention, so there was no blog post to record the event. However, I did put
up a post in July 2017 on the issue of a Closing the Gap target (link
here).
I recommend it to readers. One of its key paragraphs stated:
The reality is that where
policy challenges are characterised by complex causality, it is most often the
case that no single initiative or intervention will of itself be decisive in
driving positive change. Moreover, policymakers act within contexts and
environments which are constrained: by policy capability, by politics, by
resources, and so on. The real world policy challenge is to design a set of
incentive structures which encourage policymakers across jurisdictions, and at
all levels within jurisdictions, to work on a sustained basis toward the
desired outcome.
This blog post was followed in August 2017 by a detailed post
(link
here)
commenting on a Discussion Paper issued by the ALRC. Again, do read it in full.
But perhaps the key paragraph for present purposes is reproduced below:
But there is a sense here that
the Federal Government may have adopted a strategy of commissioning this
inquiry as a substitute for focussed action. Indeed, it is clear from the
detailed terms of reference that the policy experts in the Attorney General’s
Department already have a pretty good idea of the key drivers of Indigenous
incarceration. By commissioning this inquiry, the Government has bought space
and time. When the report is finally delivered, it will likely point to the
need for joint action by states and territories, and the very complexity of the
issues raised will mean that the Commonwealth will be under minimal pressure to
drive a coordinated and sustained law reform policy agenda through COAG.
The final ALRC report comprises around 500 pages of
detailed analysis, and makes 35 recommendations. It has the benefit of the
ALRC’s comprehensive and methodical approach to legal analysis, and draws on
the combined expertise of an expert and talented advisory panel of
criminological experts. I have not had the opportunity to read it in detail,
much less to closely analyse its contents. The data and statistical analysis in
Chapter 3 is extremely compelling, and points to deep-seated structural
inequities in the administration of justice for First Nations people. I am not
able to summarise the level of detail presented in this chapter, but it amounts
to a staggering indictment of our treatment of First Nations peoples.
I have made no assessment of the relative importance and
significance of the ALRC report’s recommendations, which encompass justice
reinvestment, bail, sentencing and aboriginality, community based sentences,
mandatory sentences, prison programs and parole, access to justice, Indigenous
women, fines and dirvers licences, alcohol, police accountability, child
protection and adult incarceration, and criminal justice targets and Aboriginal
justice agreements. The Executive summary asserts (pages 35–36) that:
Implementation of the
recommendations in this Report will reduce the disproportionate rate of
incarceration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and improve
community safety…. Reduced incarceration and greater support for Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander people in contact with the criminal justice system will,
in turn, improve health, social and economic outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander peoples.
What is not clear from the report is how Governments should
priorities the various recommendations. Nor is there any sustained argument
(notwithstanding some commentary within the report) that socio-economic
disadvantage is itself a driver of high levels of Indigenous incarceration.
Nevertheless, it is clear that the ALRC has delivered a comprehensive and
cogent report that deserves serious consideration by the Government that
commissioned it.
The elephant in the room then is this: why hasn’t the Australian
Government responded in any way to the report and recommendations of the ALRC? Or to put it even more starkly, why wont
governments do anything about the over-representation of Indigenous people in
our prison systems?
The ALRC website (link
here)
indicates that the review’s implementation status is ‘partial’ on the basis
that the WA Government has announced that it would introduce a custody
notification service, a partial implementation of recommendation 14-3. What is
crystal clear is that two years on, the Australian government as well as the
states and territories who are primarily responsible for out criminal justice
systems have done absolutely nothing.
The potential answers to these questions can be framed in
multiple ways. Lack of political will, bureaucratic incapacity, ideology,
powerlessness, fractured responsibility, constrained resources, etc etc….The
question deserves sustained and detailed attention, and the answers too will be
shaped by the viewpoints, ideology, background and political perspectives of
the person asking. I cannot in a short blog post do the question, let alone the
potential answers, justice. Suffice to say that my own view is that Indigenous
incarceration rates in Australia are the product of deep-seated structural
exclusion. The arguments for the existence of an exclusionary structures are
set out in a 2019 paper I co-authored with Neil Westbury (link
here).
Instead, I will make just a few tangential comments.
First, put yourself in the shoes of an Indigenous person
looking at this process over the past three years. What should they make of it?
What does it say about the commitment for reform generally? Should they place
any trust in the nation’s governments that there is any substantive commitment
to addressing unfair and discriminatory outcomes in social policy?
Second, what does this outcome say about our democratic
system? How is it that these issues do not appear to have been raised in a
sustained manner in Parliament?
Third, what does it say about the widespread view amongst
Australians that we live in a nation where everyone gets a fair go?
We certainly live in a lucky country. Unfortunately, it
appears that ones luck depends in large measure on whether you are Indigenous
or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment